<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REBOL Opening Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lampjr.wordpress.com/2007/01/24/rebol-opening-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lampjr.wordpress.com/2007/01/24/rebol-opening-up/</link>
	<description>Mostly Free / Open Source Software, with a little non-free too</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oldes</title>
		<link>http://lampjr.wordpress.com/2007/01/24/rebol-opening-up/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>oldes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lampjr.wordpress.com/2007/01/24/rebol-opening-up/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>If you compare Rebol and RedHat, you probably know, that RedHat distributes gigabytes so it&#039;s often easier to buy CDs or DVDs from them but Rebol stuff is only in kB and it&#039;s fine (but RT probably cannot make business on selling CDs with Rebol). RT was trying to make money on selling PRO and SDK licenses, but it looks that people these days want everything just for free and open. Anyway, I agree, that Rebol should be more open with R3 and I hope, RT will still have enough income to continue in it&#039;s existence. Because it&#039;s not easy to live in corporation&#039;s driven IT world these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you compare Rebol and RedHat, you probably know, that RedHat distributes gigabytes so it&#8217;s often easier to buy CDs or DVDs from them but Rebol stuff is only in kB and it&#8217;s fine (but RT probably cannot make business on selling CDs with Rebol). RT was trying to make money on selling PRO and SDK licenses, but it looks that people these days want everything just for free and open. Anyway, I agree, that Rebol should be more open with R3 and I hope, RT will still have enough income to continue in it&#8217;s existence. Because it&#8217;s not easy to live in corporation&#8217;s driven IT world these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
